![]() Document printed from the website of the ICRC. URL: http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/cluster-munitions-tvnews-011208 International Committee of the Red Cross 1-12-2008 TV news footage TV News Footage: Cluster Munition Convention - Oslo signing ceremony ICRC urges states to sign and ratify news treaty banning cluster munitions. Representatives from more than one hundred governments are meeting in Oslo, Norway, between 2 and 4 December, to sign the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM) adopted last May in Dublin. The treaty, which bans the use, manufacture and transfer of such weapons, also requires States Parties to destroy their stockpiles, clear remnants and assist victims and their communities.
Tv News Footage Transmission
TV news footage transmitted worldwide 1 Dec 2008
on Associated Press Global Newswire at 09.15 GMT, repeated at 12:15 GMT
and on Eurovision News Service (ENS) same day
Says Don McKay, Ambassador of New Zealand to the United Nations in Geneva: "What the convention does is it prohibits the manufacture, possession, use, transfer of all cluster munitions." Because of its comprehensive approach, the ICRC considers this treaty as an historic step forward that will put an end to the long-term suffering caused by cluster munitions among civilian populations. Says Knut Doermann, head of the ICRC legal division: "The adoption of the Cluster Munitions Convention by more than 100 states is recognition …that the use of cluster munitions causes unacceptable harm to the civilian population." There is still a lot of work ahead for this Convention to become a reality. States have to sign it, translate it into national legislation and implement it in good faith. As Doermann puts it: "What is required as next steps is the national procedures for ratification and acceptance of this convention to make sure that this convention becomes part of law of countries. In fact the ICRC is strongly urging states to do it as quickly as possible." More than 100 states are expected to sign the convention in Oslo. But the legislation will also have an impact on states which do not sign. According to Don McKay: "What we also need to do with this convention is to stigmatize cluster munitions for those countries that are outside the convention" The more states who sign, the stronger this stigmatizing effect will be. The action objectives of the Convention on Cluster Munitions (Article 3: Destruction of stockpiles within 8 years – Article 4: Clearance of remnants within 10 years – Article 5: Assistance to victims and their communities) are said to be realistic though their implementation will take a good deal of commitment according to Colin King, explosive removal expert: "We've heard a lot of strong talk, a lot of support, but in the end it's going to come down to some real commitment and a lot of resources. It's going to be very expensive to destroy stockpiles, it's going to be very expensive to clear large areas." The swift adoption of the treaty and its future implementation will help send another clear message to the major military powers that are still willing to use cluster munitions. Says Doermann: "It is also clear that if in future conflicts cluster munitions will be used and human suffering will be caused in the same magnitude as we have seen in the past, these States that continue to use cluster munitions will have a political price to pay.
Without urgent international action, the human toll of cluster munitions could become far worse than for anti-personnel landmines. Billions of cluster submunitions have been stockpiled by the world's states. Many models are aged, inaccurate and unreliable. But while landmines were in the hands of virtually all armed forces, only about 75 states currently possess cluster munitions. It is therefore not too late to prevent human suffering on a potentially massive scale. Cluster munitions are usually bombs, rocket or artillery shells which open to release up to 650 smaller 'bomblets'. These bomblets, known as submunitions, disperse and explode over a wide area. Experience over the last four decades has shown that between 10 and 40% of them fail to detonate. At the time of use, they can have a devastating impact over wide areas. It took the 2006 war in southern Lebanon to make the world finally sit up and take notice of the dreadful consequences of cluster munitions. In just one month an estimated 37 million square metres of land were contaminated with up to a million unexploded cluster submunitions. More than 250 civilians and clearance operators have been killed and injured by them since the fighting ended. Unexploded submunitions have turned large tracts of land into deadly no-go areas in some 20 countries and areas of the world - including Afghanistan, Cambodia, Iraq, the Balkans, Lebanon, Tajikistan and Vietnam. The world's worst affected county is Laos. Facts and figures
LOGLIST Date, location: November 2008, Geneva. Archives: Ireland (May 2008), Lebanon 2006, Serbia 1999, Laos 2006-7
00 00 Dublin Diplomatic Conference (May 2008): panel, activists lying in the street 00 37 Micheál Martin, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Ireland"We have created a future unknown survivor, one symbolic person who thanks to the new convention, will not fall victim to cluster munitions" 00 48 State representatives (civilian and military) inside the Conference building 00 53 Dáithí O'Ceallaigh, President of the Dublin Diplomatic Conference (May 2008) "I see no objections. The Convention is adopted." 01 14: Don McKay, Ambassador of New Zealand to the United Nations in Geneva "What the convention does is it prohibits the manufacture, possession, use, transfer of all cluster munitions." 01 24 ITW Knut Doermann, Head of ICRC Legal Division: "The adoption of the Cluster Munitions Convention by more than 100 states is a recognition of an important part of the international community that the use of cluster munitions causes unacceptable harm to the civilian population. The signal that is sent out by these 100 states will surely have an impact also on the other states that are not yet ready to join the process." 01 47 Dáithí O'Ceallaigh, President of the Dublin Diplomatic Conference. Delegates applauding 02 04: ITW Don McKay, Ambassador of New Zealand to the United Nations in Geneva "What we also need to do with this convention is to stigmatize cluster munitions for those countries that are outside the convention and that requires getting as many countries to bring it into force, to become party to it as quickly as possible. The reality is of course that a convention that has 100 parties to it has a greater stigmatizing effect on the weapon than a convention that has 30 countries party to it." 02 35 Child victims of cluster bomb explosions showing injuries- various (Lebanon, Serbia) 03 04 Man and child – injured, walking (Afghanistan) 03 09 ITW Colin King, explosive removal expert Whether or not the Convention is realistic really depends on the level of political will. We've heard a lot of strong talk, a lot of support, but in the end it's going to come down to some real commitment and a lot of resources. It's going to be very expensive to destroy stockpiles, it's going to be very expensive to clear large areas. Yes, I think it is realistic and achievable but it will require a good deal of commitment." 03 37 Damaged buildings by cluster strikes - various (Lebanon) 04 05 Travelling and close up on a submunition on terrace (Lebanon) 04 12 Don MacKay, Ambassador of New Zealand to the United Nations in Geneva "It also has extremely good provisions on stockpile destruction. Stockpiles have to be destroyed within an 8-year period. It has provisions that require States that are affected by cluster munitions, in other words with cluster munitions remnants, to remove those clusters, with international assistance of course, within a period of 10 years. And it creates very strong victim assistance provisions as well." 04 44 Close-up of unexploded submunitions - various types and designs 05 17 ITW Knut Doermann, Head of ICRC Legal Division "Signature alone is not sufficient for this Convention to have a real impact in reality. What is required as next steps is the national procedures for ratification and acceptance of this convention to make sure that this convention becomes part of law of countries. It is first and foremost important that as many states as possible join this treaty and go through these national procedures. In fact the ICRC is strongly urging states to do it as quickly as possible" 05 50 Clearing farmland of cluster bombs by FSD (Swiss Foundation for Mine Action) showing deminers at work, wheat field and farmer discussing clearance process looking at land which he cannot use (Lebanon). 06 17 Deminer puts explosive around subminution, then countdown for destruction and explosion (Lebanon) 06 38 Deminer with detecting device in forest (Laos) – various shots (Plus countdown and explosion) 07 02: ITW Knut Doermann, Head of ICRC Legal Division "It is also clear that if in future conflicts cluster munitions will be used and human suffering will be caused in the same magnitude as we have seen in the past, these states that continue to use cluster munitions will have a political price to pay." 07 19 Town during a cluster strike (Serbia), showing wounded civilians in suburban area, dead dog, man lying on ground, close-up yellow unexploded cluster submunition. 07 49 ITW Lt Colonel Jim Burke, Military Advisor, Irish Defence Forces "Military people are generally pretty practical. They don't want unreliable or inaccurate munitions, they also don't want to be in a position of being forced to use a weapon which is stigmatized internationally and they don't want to be accused of disobeying international humanitarian law. So I think there will be a desire amongst many of my colleagues that this question is addressed." 08 13 Cluster bomb sequence showing air launch, bomb casings opening, cluster munitions released and exploding on the ground (archive footage, ICRC film, "The Convention on Cluster Munitions: Time to Act")
09 32 ITW Peter Herby, Head of Arms Unit, ICRC "There is a military utility for every weapon. There was an argument saying chemical weapons had a military role, this went on for decades but in the end the politicians have to decide that some weapons are beyond the pale. They have to decide that the human cost of using these weapons, of allowing them to be used is too high and they have to be prohibited or restricted on that basis. And that's what international humanitarian law is all about."
10 01 ENDS For more information, please contact: Simon Schorno, ICRC Geneva, tel: +41 22 730 2426 or mobile +41 79 251 9302 For audiovisual requests and information: For broadcast tapes and information on footage: Didier Revol, ICRC Geneva, tel: +41 22 730 3681 |