News Section Terrorism and international humanitarian law
If committed in times of armed conflicts - international or non-international - acts commonly considered as terrorist, such as attacks on civilians, indiscriminate attacks, and the taking of hostages, are expressly prohibited by international humanitarian law. Similarly, if the fight against terrorism takes the form of an armed conflict, it is regulated by international humanitarian law: both in terms of conduct of hostilities and in terms of protection to be afforded to captured persons.
21-7-2005 The relevance of IHL in the context of terrorismEvents in recent years have increased interest in the issue of how international humanitarian law is applied in today's context of violent confrontation. In a new paper, the ICRC provides answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about international humanitarian law and terrorism. (Humanitarian law\Other issues\Terrorism) Official Statement 5-5-2004 International humanitarian law and terrorism: questions and answersWhat does IHL say about terrorism? - Does IHL specifically mention terrorism? -
Is the "war on terrorism" an armed conflict? - What law applies to persons detained in the fight against terrorism? - What is the ICRC's role with respect to persons detained in the fight against terrorism? (Humanitarian law\Reaffirmation and development) 31-10-2002 What does humanitarian law say about terrorism?Extract from ICRC publication "International humanitarian law: answers to your questions" (Humanitarian law\IHL in brief) 15-11-2002 What is ICRC's position on terrorism?
ICRC strongly condemns acts of violence which are indiscriminate and spread terror among the civilian population. It has voiced its condemnation of such acts on many occasions, including after the attacks in the USA on 11 September 2001. (Info resources\Frequently asked questions) FAQ 30-6-2007 Lessons for human rights and humanitarian law in the war on terror: comparing Hamdan and the Israeli Targeted Killings caseThe article examines and compares two recent judgments which provide some of the most valuable examples of the difficulties surrounding the application of international humanitarian law to the phenomenon of terrorism: the Hamdan judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Targeted Killings judgment of the Supreme Court of Israel. Both judgments deal with the thresholds of applicability of the law of armed conflict, as well as with the concept of unlawful combatancy and the relationship between human rights law and humanitarian law. (Info resources\International Review\2007 - No. 866) International Review of the Red Cross Includes PDF 31-12-2006 International treaties against terrorism and the use of terrorism during armed conflict and by armed forcesTerrorism-oriented legislation, which initially covered only acts affecting civilians, has gradually expanded to cover some acts of terrorism against military personnel and installations. This contribution attempts to assess the repercussions of this evolution on the status and the protection of armed forces engaged in the so-called ‘‘war on terrorism’’ by examining the existing dynamic between these regulations and international humanitarian law. (Info resources\International Review\2006 - No. 864) International Review of the Red Cross Includes PDF 30-9-2005 Use of nuclear and radiological weapons by terrorists?The hurdles for terrorists to get a nuclear weapon are extremely high. The probability of terrorist use of such a weapon is therefore extremely low. In contrast to the nuclear weapon case there are in principle no insurmountable obstacles to the acquisition and use of radiological weapons by a well-organized terrorist group, even though such an action remains high-tech and thus very difficult. (Info resources\International Review\2005 - No. 859) International Review of the Red Cross Includes PDF 31-3-2005 Casting light on the legal black hole: International law and detentions abroad in the “war on terror”In the deprivation of liberty by agents acting outside the sovereign territory of their State, the prevention of violations of fundamental norms and values is particularly important. (Info resources\International Review\2005 - No. 857) International Review of the Red Cross Includes PDF 31-3-2005 Human rights and indefinite detentionInternational human rights law abhors a legal black hole. It applies wherever a State exercises its jurisdiction, not only in peacetime but also during armed conflict, as a compliment to humanitarian law. The deprivation of liberty is subject to certain conditions, and even initially lawful detention becomes arbitrary and contrary to law if it is not subject to periodic review. (Info resources\International Review\2005 - No. 857) International Review of the Red Cross Includes PDF 30-9-2002 Doubtful prisoner-of-war statusThis article explores how doubt over prisoner-of-war status may arise and how issues relating to the determination of status should be resolved according to the Third Geneva Convention. In this context, a State's obligations in cases of "doubtful" status are examined, as are the minimal requirements of a "competent tribunal". (Info resources\International Review\2002 - No. 847) International Review of the Red Cross Includes PDF 30-9-2002 Acts of terror, "terrorism" and international humanitarian lawThis article examines the international humanitarian law applicable to acts of terror. All acts of terror committed during international or non-international armed conflicts are prohibited without exception. In addition, the author argues that State responses to terrorist acts are also regulated by international humanitarian law when carried out during an armed conflict. (Info resources\International Review\2002 - No. 847) International Review of the Red Cross Includes PDF 30-9-2002 Just war, war of aggression and international humanitarian lawThis article relates the history of the rules and principles adopted to limit violence, and of those prohibiting recourse to war. The author explains that the applicability of international humanitarian law does not depend on a war's causes, even in the case of a war of aggression, and that no discrimination is admissible regarding the law's application. (Info resources\International Review\2002 - No. 847) International Review of the Red Cross Includes PDF 19-10-2006 Developments in US policy and legislation towards detainees: the ICRC positionIn an interview for the ICRC website, the organization's President, Jakob Kellenberger, talks about the recent developments in US policy and legislation towards those detained in the fight against terrorism. (Humanitarian law\Reaffirmation and development) Interview 1-7-2003 Interesting Times for International Humanitarian Law: Challenges from the “War on Terror”Article published in "the Fletcher Forum of World Affairs", vol. 27:2, Summer/Fall 2003 (Humanitarian law\Other issues\Terrorism) Legal article Includes PDF 31-10-2002 Defining the War on Terror and Status of Detainees: Comments on the Presentation of Judge George AldrichExtract from "Humanitäres Völkerrecht", No 4/2002, a review published by the German Red Cross and the "Institute For International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict" in Bochum. (Humanitarian law\Protected persons and property\Prisoners of war) Legal article Includes PDF 31-10-2002 The Taliban, al Qaeda, and the Determination of Illegal CombatantsExtract from "Humanitäres Völkerrecht", No 4/2002, a review published by the German Red Cross and the "Institute For International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict" in Bochum. The author is a judge at the Iran-US Claims Tribunal. (Humanitarian law\Protected persons and property\Prisoners of war) Legal article Includes PDF 19-10-2006 Challenges faced by ICRC and international humanitarian law (IHL)Speech delivered by Dr. Jakob Kellenberger, President of the ICRC, at Georgetown University, Washington. (Humanitarian law\Reaffirmation and development) Official Statement 14-9-2004 The relevance of international humanitarian law in contemporary armed conflictsCommittee of legal advisers on public international law (CADHI), 28th meeting
Lausanne, 13-14 September 2004 - Intervention by Dr. Jakob Kellenberger, President of
the ICRC
(Humanitarian law\Reaffirmation and development) Official Statement 17-3-2004 60th Annual Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights - Statement by the President of the ICRCICRC President Jakob Kellenberger, in his address to the Commission, highlighted the tragedy of missing persons and spoke of the interrelationship between bodies of law designed to protect human dignity. Geneva, 17 March 2004. (ICRC Activities\Humanitarian diplomacy\United Nations\Commission on human rights) Official Statement 16-3-2004 When is a war not a war? - The proper role of the law of armed conflict in the "global war on terror""International Action to Prevent and Combat Terrorism" - Workshop on the Protection of Human Rights While Countering Terrorism, Copenhagen, 15-16 March 2004 - Presentation given by Gabor Rona, legal adviser at the ICRC’s Legal Division. (Humanitarian law\Other issues\Terrorism) Official Statement 19-5-2004 Protecting life and dignity: "No war is above international law"Jakob Kellenberger, ICRC president, says the organization condemns indiscriminate terrorist attacks unreservedly, but insists that the response to them must remain within the framework of the law. Article published in the Financial Times (UK) on 19 May 2004 and reproduced here with the FT's kind permission. (Humanitarian law\Reaffirmation and development) Press article 1-3-2004 "War" doesn't justify GuantanamoArticle by Gabor Rona, legal adviser at the ICRC’s legal division, as published in the Financial Times on 1 March 2004 (Humanitarian law\Other issues\Terrorism) Press article 19-2-2008 International humanitarian law and the challenges of contemporary armed conflictsOfficial working document of the 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, Geneva, 26 to 30 November 2007. (Humanitarian law\Reaffirmation and development) Report Includes PDF 19-5-2006 Strategic Foresight GroupStrategic Foresight Group is a think tank that conducts research and launches policy change initiatives to help decision makers to anticipate and influence the future in uncertain times. (Info resources\Other sites\Non-governmental organizations) Other site |