• Send page
  • Print page

Regulating the conduct of urban warfare: lessons from contemporary asymmetric armed conflicts

30-06-2010 Article, International Review of the Red Cross, No. 878, by Michael John-Hopkins

A survey of contemporary armed conflicts indicates that major military powers are increasingly facing militarily weaker adversaries and being drawn into unconventional engagements in cities. It is submitted that higher standards of reasonableness be imposed upon military commanders, and furthermore that civilian populations be spared more effectively from the effects of urban warfare by applying customary law.

 

Michael John-Hopkins is a Tutor in Law and Ph.D. candidate at the Department of Law and Criminology, Aberystwyth University,Wales, United Kingdom. 
 
Abstract 
A survey of contemporary armed conflicts indicates that major military powers are increasingly facing militarily weaker adversaries and being drawn into unconventional engagements in cities, towns, and villages. Given the asymmetry of military   capabilities in such conflicts, it is submitted that higher standards of reasonableness be imposed upon military commanders of major military powers to ensure constant   care for civilian populations, and furthermore that civilian populations be spared more effectively from the effects of urban warfare by applying customary law ab initio, in   order to avoid gaps in protection that may arise from the premature classification of armed conflicts.






pdf file
Full text in PDF format

 (383kb)

  About Acrobat PDF files 
 


Related pages