ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Commentary -
Art. 8. Annex I : Draft agreement relating to hospital zones and localities
ARTICLE 8
-- CONTROL
It is only reasonable that a belligerent who recognizes a zone established by the opposing party should be able to demand the setting up of a controlling body to ascertain, for example, if the obligations under Articles 4
and 5
of the Agreement are duly fulfilled.
The draft submitted to the Diplomatic Conference stipulated that this function should be entrusted to the Power protecting the interests of the State which had recognized the zone. It would have been possible in this way to utilize an organization ready to carry out the work on the spot. The Conference was nevertheless unwilling to agree to this [p.424] solution, as they considered that the Protecting Powers were already overburdened with multifarious tasks.
The Draft Agreement accordingly entrusts control to Special Commissions, Their composition is not indicated, however; nor is it said by whom their members will be appointed. These points will have to be settled at the time the Agreement is concluded. The members of the Commissions will no doubt be neutrals, chosen by mutual agreement between the belligerents and representing either the Protecting Powers or other neutral States.
The Agreement does not specify the qualifications or qualities which members of the Commissions must possess. As their main duty will be to supervise the execution of measures of a military nature, it will usually be desirable to obtain the assistance of officers, such as the military attachés of the Protecting Power or other neutral Powers. The participation of doctors would also appear to be indicated.
In order to be able to carry out their task, the members of the Commissions will at all times have free access to the various zones; they may even reside there permanently.