ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Commentary -
Art. 16. Part II : General protection of prisoners of war
[p.154] ARTICLE 16
. -- EQUALITY OF TREATMENT
This Article contains a statement of the principle that all prisoners of war are to receive the same standard of treatment, with a further clause of non-discrimination, but subject to the special provisions expressly laid down in the Convention. The prohibition of discrimination is not in fact incompatible with certain differentiation in treatment for which specific provision is made in various Articles of the Convention. Such differentiation may be based on rank (Articles 39, paras. 2 and 3
; 40
, 43
, 44
, 45
, 49, paras. 2 and 3
; 60
, 89, para. 2
; 97, para. 3
; 98, para. 2
), sex (Articles 14, para. 2
; 25
, para. 4
; 29, para. 2
; 49, para. 1
; 88, paras. 2 and 3
; 97, para. 4
; 108, para. 2
), aptitude for work (Articles 49
, 53
, 55
, 62
), age (Articles 49, para. 1
; 45
) or state of health (Articles 30
, 49, para. 1
; 55, para. 2
; 92, para. 3
; 98, para. 4
; 108, para. 3
; 109
, 110
, 114
). The wording excludes differentiation only when it is of an adverse nature. Absolute equality might easily become injustice if applied without regard to considerations such as state of
health, age, sex, rank or professional aptitude. The principle of equality in the Convention must therefore be understood in this way which admits such differentiation (1).
It is clear from the wording of the provision that the list of various criteria which it contains is only by way of example; one might add many more criteria -- birth, financial circumstances, language, colour, social status, etc.
* (1) [(1) p.154] See Jean S. PICTET: ' Red Cross Principles, '
pp. 32-40;