ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Commentary -
Art. 45. Part III : Captivity #Section II : Internment of prisoners of war #Chapter VII : Rank of prisoners of war
ARTICLE 45
. -- TREATMENT OF OTHER PRISONERS
This provision is new. It was introduced at the 1949 Diplomatic Conference after one delegation pointed out that, with the exception of orderlies, Article 44
dealt only with officers and prisoners of war with equivalent status (1).
What we have said in connection with paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 44
therefore applies also, ' mutatis mutandis, ' to the present Article, which uses the same basic text. During the discussion it was suggested that the scope of the provision might be limited to noncommissioned officers, but one delegation then pointed out that in the navy, for instance, sailors could be of different grades without being non-commissioned officers (2). The Conference therefore approved a more general wording.
As regards supervision of the mess ("gestion" in the French text), the comments on Article 44
are applicable here also.
* (1) [(2) p.252] See ' Final Record of the Diplomatic
Conference of Geneva of 1949, ' Vol. II-A, pp. 267-268;
(2) [(3) p.252] Ibid., p. 359;