ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Commentary -
Art. 116. Part IV : Termination of captivity #Section I : Direct repatriation and accommodation in neutral countries
ARTICLE 116
. -- COSTS OF REPATRIATION
The present provision is similar to Article 73
of the 1929 Convention. As has been done wherever it occurred in the 1929 text, however, the expression "Power in whose armed forces prisoners served" has been replaced by the words "Power on which the prisoners depend" in order to take into account the fact that certain military personnel do not necessarily serve in the armed forces of their Power of origin. Certain merchant seamen and civilian air crews are in a similar position (1).
In the case of transport by air, special arrangements must be made unless it is considered that the obligation of the Detaining Power ceases at the airfield in its territory which is nearest to the territory of the Power on which prisoners of war depend, by analogy with the solution provided in Article 118, paragraph 4 (b
, in the case of transport by sea (2).
* (1) [(2) p.537] See ' Report on the Work of the Conference of
Government Experts, ' pp. 241-242;
(2) [(3) p.537] See below the commentary on Article 118,
paragraph 4;