ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Commentary -
Art. 10. Annex II : Regulations concerning mixed medical commissions (see Article 112)
ARTICLE 10
. -- TASKS OF THE COMMISSIONS
The tasks of the Commissions are defined in Article 113
, to which the present Article makes a reference. Mention should also be made of the prisoners of war referred to in Articles 114
and 115
. In addition to the proposals mentioned, the Commissions should also be able to propose accommodation in a neutral country, if this is possible for the prisoners of war examined; this will depend on the conclusion of agreements between the Detaining Power and the neutral country (Article 109, paragraph 2
) (1). This is clear from the wording of the model repatriation certificate (Annex IV E), to which the next Article
refers.
* (1) [(1) p.661] In this connection, one should note the
difference in wording between the present Article, which
states that the Medical Commissions shall ' propose '
repatriation, etc., and Article 1 1, which speaks of
' decisions '. In fact the Commissions take decisions, for
Article 12 expressly states that the Detaining Power is
' required to carry out the decisions ' of the
Commissions;