ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977.
Commentary -
Ratification
[p.1071] Article 93
-- Ratification
General remarks
3700 Article 93
is the natural and indispensable complement to the preceding article relating to signature. Ratification is the act by
which a State Party to the Conventions, which is a signatory to the
Protocol, binds itself definitively to this instrument so that it
applies to its relations with the other Contracting Parties. If the
State concerned wishes to do so, these two steps can be replaced by
the single act of accession.
3701 Moreover, there is the possibility of "notification of succession"; by means of such notification a newly independent State
continues its participation to a [p.1072] treaty established on his
behalf, before it became independent, by the former administering
power. This possibility exists even though it has not been laid down
in the Protocol; (1) it was used for the Conventions in a large
number of cases. (2) However, it does not seem very probable that a
case of succession will arise for the Protocol.
3702 The definitive undertaking in the form of ratification, accession or succession, should be distinguished, on the one hand, from the
contingencies laid down in Article 96
' (Treaty relations upon entry
into force of this Protocol), ' paragraphs 2 and 3, and, on the
other, from notice of the provisional application of treaties by a
newly independent State. (3)
3703 The Swiss federal Council was the depositary of the Conventions of 1949 and of all their preceding Conventions, and it was obvious
that its role should be extended to the Protocol aimed at
supplementing them. (4)
3704 This article was adopted by consensus, both in Committee I and in plenary. (5)
Analysis of the article
' The nature of ratification '
3705 The Conference chose for signature to be followed by ratification, and for accession, out of the various ways in which
consent to be bound by a treaty can be expressed. (6)
3706 As signature does not bind a State definitively, it can be appended fairly easily. On the other hand, ratification commits the State, which must henceforth comply with the obligations contained in
the treaty; it therefore requires a thorough examination on the
merits, and means that a number of domestic procedures laid down in
the constitution of every State must be followed.
3707 Preparing for ratification can in fact be accompanied by the development of measures for the execution of the obligations such as
those envisaged in Article 80
' (Measures for execution); ' at least
a preliminary study of such measures is indispensable in the
examination of ratification. On the other hand, their final drafting
and implementation do not become legal obligations until the Protocol
has been ratified or even not until it has entered into force with
regard to the State concerned. (7)
[p.1073] 3708 The minimum obligation of every State between depositing its ratification and the entry into force of the treaty for it, is to
refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of the
treaty. (8)
3709 The expression "as soon as possible" is not very common. It has been taken from the corresponding article of the Conventions
(57
/56
/137
/152
) and represents an exhortation without laying down a
precise period. (9)
' The form of the ratification '
3710 The instrument of ratification must be deposited by the diplomatic representatives of the country concerned with the Swiss
federal Council, or transmitted in the form of a written
communication.
' Reservations and declarations '
3711 The instrument of ratification must also mention any reservations and declarations that may be made and, if the question arises,
confirm declarations of any nature made at the time of the signature,
if the State wishes to maintain these. (10) However, a declaration in
accordance with Article 90
' (International Fact-Finding
Commission), ' paragraph 2(a), made at the time of signature, (11)
does not need to be confirmed upon ratification in order to be
maintained. Moreover, it can be made at any time after the
ratification.
' Notification by the depositary '
3712 The depositary will notify the deposit of every instrument of ratification, as well as any declarations and reservations, in
accordance with Article 100
(' Notifications '), sub-paragraph (a)
and (c). As of 31 December 1984, 18 of the 62 signatory States had
ratified the Protocol, of which six did so with a declaration in
accordance with Article 90
' (International Fact-Finding
Commission), ' paragraph 2(a), and seven with reservations or
declarations (12)
' B.Z. '
NOTES (1) [(1) p.1072] The question is dealt with in the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties
of 23 August 1978;
(2) [(2) p.1072] Cf. B. Zimmermann, "La succession d'Etats et les Conventions de Genève", in ' Studies and Essays in
honour of Jean Pictet ', op. cit., p. 113;
(3) [(3) p.1072] Ibid. Cf. also the above-mentioned Convention, supra note 1, Arts. 27-29;
(4) [(4) p.1072] For an overall picture of the functions of the depositary, cf. commentary Art. 100, infra, p. 1114;
(5) [(5) p.1072] O.R. IX, p. 473, CDDH/I/SR.76, para. 3; O.R. VI, p. 351, CDDH/SR.46, para. 67;
(6) [(6) p.1072] Cf. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969, Arts. 11-16;
(7) [(7) p.1072] Cf. Art. 95;
(8) [(8) p.1073] Cf. Convention mentioned above, supra, note 6, Article 18 (Obligation not to defeat the object and
purpose of a treaty prior to its entry into force),
sub-para. (b);
(9) [(9) p.1073] One delegation would have liked to delete this clause: O.R. X, p. 240, CDDH/405/Rev.1, Annex III
(CDDH/I/350/Rev.1), para. 7; O.R. VI, p. 351, CDDH/SR.46,
para. 68; p. 375, id., Annex (Indonesia);
(10) [(10) p.1073] On the general question of reservations to the Protocol, cf. introduction to this Part, supra, pp.
1059-1065;
(11) [(11) p.1073] This possibility was not used;
(12) [(12) p.1073] For the list of ratifications, with references to all reservations or declarations, cf. infra,
p. 1549;