ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 8 June 1977.
Commentary -
Dissemination
[p.1487] Article 19
-- Dissemination
4903 Dissemination is a legal obligation under the Conventions, (1) reaffirmed and developed in the Protocols. It is based on the
obligation undertaken by States when ratifying or acceding to the
Conventions to "respect and to ensure respect [...] in all
circumstances", which also applies to common Article 3
. (2)
4904 However, we are concerned here with the first express mention of this obligation in the regulation of non-international armed
conflicts. Protocol II develops and supplements common Article 3
, (3)
so that dissemination of the one is inextricably bound up with
dissemination of the other.
[p.1488] 4905 The ICRC draft (4) laid down more detailed measures by making a distinction between dissemination which should be implemented in time
of peace and that required in time of armed conflict, and also
according to whether it was intended for the armed forces or for
civilians. Similar indications are given in the corresponding Article
83
of Protocol I ' (Dissemination). ' Only the brief wording of the
article under consideration here was retained. It merely lays down an
obligation in general, without specifying what it entails.
4906 Dissemination should be carried out as widely as possible. The choice of means is left to the Contracting Party or to the parties to
the conflict. Some delegations argued that an unduly detailed
provision could produce difficulties for States, (5) particularly as
regards implementation in time of armed conflict.
4907 Dissemination plays two important roles which are emphasized in Resolution 21 relating to this subject, adopted at the end of the
Diplomatic Conference; on the one hand, knowledge of the law is a
factor for the effective application of the law, on the other, it is
a factor for engendering a spirit of peace.
4908 There is no mechanism in Protocol II designed to guarantee its application such as that of Protecting Powers or their
substitute. (6) Therefore dissemination is a fortiori an essential
measure of application. (7) In fact, the ICRC had included it in Part
VII of its draft on measures for execution of the Protocol. (8)
4909 It is self-evidend that in time of peace the obligation falls on the Contracting Party. In case of an armed conflict which meets the
criteria of Article 1
of the Protocol ' (Material field of
application), ' it will be up to both the government authorities and
those responsible in the insurgent party, to take all necessary
measures for disseminating the contents of the instrument to those
carrying responsibility under their authority, military personnel as
well as civilians.
4910 A law that is not known cannot be applied, but a knowledge of the law should not be restricted to situations of conflict, for over and
above rules of law, it is a matter of inculcating moral principles
with a view to limiting violence and preserving peace. Thus
dissemination should properly be seen in its context; it is fully
recognized by the United Nations as an integral part of education
aimed at preserving world peace by promoting "understanding,
tolerance and friendship among all nations", in accordance with the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (9)
4911 At a practical level, it may at first sight seem difficult for a State to disseminate rules applicable in a potential situation of
non-international armed conflict. However, hope of getting protection
under Protocol II cannot in itself prompt a Party to initiate such a
conflict; the deep-rooted reasons that could give rise to such
conflicts are of quite a different nature. (10)
[p.1489] 4912 However, it should especially be recalled that the philosophy and principles of humanitarian law remain the same whatever the nature of
the conflict. The same is true for instruction. For example, in
military training programmes the behaviour which soldiers should be
taught such as respect for and protection of enemies ' hors de
combat, ' the wounded and civilians, are exactly the same. In
academic fields, instruction in the law of armed conflict, as urged
by the United Nations, (11) follows naturally from the teaching of
human rights, both being systems of law protecting human beings in
specific circumstances. These two bodies of law are already being
taught in certain institutions under a single integrated
programme. (12)
4913 Brief though Article 19 is, its adoption represents a significant development. It intimates that the purely humanitarian quality of the
rules governing non-international armed conflicts is recognized, and
that disseminating them contributes to creating a spirit of peace
without in any way acting as an incitement to rebellion. (13)
' S.J. '
* (1) [(1) p.1487] Art. 47/48/127/144 of the Conventions;
(2) [(2) p.1487] Common Article 1 of the Conventions;
(3) [(3) p.1488] See Art. 1, para. 1, Protocol II, and the commentary thereon, supra, p. 1350;
(4) [(4) p.1488] Draft Art. 37;
(5) [(5) p.1488] O.R. IX, p. 243. CDDH/I/SR.59, para. 39;
(6) [(6) p.1488] However, it should be recalled that an impartial humanitarian organization such as the ICRC may
assist in supervising the application of common Article 3
(under the terms of its paragraph 2) and of the Protocol.
See introduction to Part I, supra, p. 1343;
(7) [(7) p.1488] See O.R. IX, p. 241, CDDH/I/SR.59, para. 30;
(8) [(8) p.1488] In the end the Part "Execution of the present Protocol" (Arts. 36-39 of the draft) was not adopted as
such. On this point, see introduction to Part V, supra, p.
1483;
(9) [(9) p.1488] Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Art. 26, para. 2;
(10) [(10) p.1488] O.R. IX, p. 242, CDDH/I/SR.59, para. 33;
(11) [(11) p.1489] Resolutions 2852 (XXVI), 3032 (XXVII), 3500 (XXX) and 32/34 of the United Nations General Assembly;
(12) [(12) p.1489] For example, the International Institute of Human Rights (Strasbourg); Inter-American Institute of
Human Rights (San José, Costa Rica);
(13) [(13) p.1489] See also commentary Art. 83, Protocol I, supra, p. 959;