ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III), 8 December 2005
Commentary -
Amendment
Article 13 - Amendment
1. Paragraph 1
This provision is taken verbatim from Article 97
, paragraph 1, of Additional Protocol I and Article 24
, paragraph 1, of Additional Protocol II, though with one exception: the latter provisions mention only the ICRC (in addition to the High Contracting Parties) for consultation on a proposed amendment. The Commentary indicates that the consultation with the ICRC is meant to be a recognition of its role in the codification and development of humanitarian law.
[72] The fact that the particular subject of the emblem concerns the other components of the Movement, and the role played by the International Federation in the elaboration of Additional Protocol III, easily explain why the Federation should also be consulted in all proceedings related to potential amendments.
2.
Paragraph
This provision is identical to Article 97
, paragraph 2, of Additional Protocol I and Article 24
, paragraph 2, of Additional Protocol II. It is sufficient, therefore, to refer to the commentary
on those provisions.
[73]
Notes
72.
See
Commentary on Protocol
, above note 17, p. 1095 (§ 3783).
73.
Ibid.
,
pp. 1096-1097 (§§ 3786-3790).