ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III), 8 December 2005
Commentary -
Preamble
The title of Additional Protocol III is based on those of Additional Protocols I
and II
, adopted on 8 June 1977 and relating to international and non-international armed conflicts. Specific legal consequences flow from this wording.
Like its two predecessors of 1977, Additional Protocol III is no more than an “additional” instrument and cannot be regarded as an independent document. It is formally linked to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 for the protection of victims of war,
[15]
making it impossible to become party to the Protocol without already being party to the Conventions (or becoming party to them simultaneously
[16]
). The connection to the substantive rules of the Geneva Conventions is equally strong. Additional Protocol III
supplements their substantive rules and implementation mechanisms, but it is in turn governed by relevant provisions in the 1949 Conventions that it has not amended – in particular their general and final provisions as well as the general principles of international humanitarian law that the Conventions cover.
[17]
The subject matter of Additional Protocol III, however, is relatively restricted compared with that of the two Additional Protocols of 1977: it supplements the Geneva Conventions by permitting the use of an additional distinctive sign. The reiteration of the term “additional” clearly indicates that the distinctive emblem established by Protocol III is not intended to replace the emblems recognized by the 1949 Geneva Conventions, but to offer the High Contracting Parties – as well as the other components of the Movement, and potentially other authorized actors – the possibility of using an additional emblem subject to the conditions set forth in the body of the text.
Notes
15.
First Geneva Convention
for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, Second Geneva Convention
for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of the Armed Forces at Sea, Third Geneva Convention
relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War,
Fourth Geneva Convention
relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War.
16
.
On this point, see the
Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949,
ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987,
pp. 1069 (§ 3693) and 1076 (§ 3715).
17
.
Ibid.
, p. 20 (§§ 4-6).