ICRC databases on international humanitarian law
Photo
of
Previous photo
Next photo
CLOSE
x
ICRC
Skip navigation
Home
|
What's new
|
Contacts
Language
Select one
Francais
Search
International Committee of the Red Cross
Treaties and States parties to such Treaties
Who we are
Who we are - International Committee of the Red Cross
Mandate and mission
Structure
Finances
Working for the ICRC
The Movement
History
Funds and medals
Contacts
What we do
What we do - ICRC activities on behalf of people affected by war
Visiting detainees
Protecting civilians
Reuniting families
Ensuring economic security
Water and habitat
Health
Cooperation with National Societies
Building respect for IHL
Safeguarding health care
Other activities
Where we work
Where we work - the ICRC worldwide
Africa
Americas
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central Asia
Middle East
War & Law
War & Law - the legal basis for our action
Treaties and customary law
Contemporary challenges for IHL
Protected persons
Conduct of hostilities
Weapons
Emblem
IHL in domestic law
International criminal jurisdiction
IHL and other legal regimes
Resource centre
Resource centre - Search
Publications and films
Photos
Maps
International review
Annual report
IHL databases
Library and research services
ICRC Archives
Events
Other sites
Gift shop
Video newsroom
Search
Treaties and Documents
1949 Conventions and Additional Protocols, and their Commentaries
By date
By topic
By State
Historical Treaties and Documents
By date
By topic
By State
Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989.
Denmark
Reservations made upon ratification :
Article 40, paragraph 2 (b) (v) shall not be binding on Denmark.
It is a fundamental principle of the Danish Administration of Justice Act that everybody shall be entitled to have any penal measures imposed on him or her by a court of first instance reviewed by a higher court. There are, however, some provisions limiting this right in certain cases, for instance verdicts returned by a jury on the question of guilt, which have not been reversed by the legally trained judges of the court.
In this regard, on 16 November 1995, the Secretary-General received from the Government of Denmark, the following communication:
Because of their unlimited scope and undefined character these reservations are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and accordingly inadmissible and without effect under international law. Therefore, the Government of Denmark objects to these reservations. The Convention remains in force in its entirety between Djibouti, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan, the Syrian Arab Republic respectively and Denmark.
It is the opinion of the Government of Denmark that no time limit applies to objections against reservations, which are inadmissible under international law.
The Government of Denmark recommends the Governments of Djibouti, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan and the Syrian Arab Republic to reconsider their reservations to the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
SOURCE : Multilateral Treaties deposited with the Secretary-General, Status as at 31 December 1991, United Nations, New York, 1992, p.199. and C.N.370.1995.TREATIES-9 (Depositary Notification)
(2 July 1996):
"The reservation is covering multiple provisions, including central provisions of the Convention. Furthermore, it is a general principle of international law that internal law may not be invoked as justification for failure to perform treaty obligations. Consequently, the Government of Denmark considers the said reservation as being incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and accordingly inadmissible and without effect under international law. The Convention remains in force in its entirety between Malaysia and Denmark.
It is the opinion of the Government of Denmark that no time limit applies to objections against reservations, which are inadmissible under international law.
The Government of Denmark recommends the Government of Malaysia to reconsider its reservation to the said Convention."
On 3 July 1996, the Secretary-General received from the Government of Denmark a communication regarding the reservations made by Botswana and Qatar, identical in essence,
mutatis mutandis
, as the one made on 16 November 1995.
10 Februa
ry 1997
With regard to the reservation made by Brunéi Darussalam and Saudi Arabia upon accession:
"The Government of Denmark finds that the general reservation with reference to the provisions of Islamic law is of unlimited scope and undefined character. Consequently, the Government of Denmark considers the said reservation as being incompatible with the object and purposes of the Convention and accordingly inadmissible and without effect under international law. Furthermore, it is a general principle of international law that national law may not be invoked as justification for failure to perform treaty obligations.
The Convention remains in force in its entirety between Brunéi Darussalam and Denmark.
It is the opinion of the Government of Denmark, that no time limit applies to objections against reservations, which are inadmissible under international law.
The Government of Denmark recommends the Government of Brunéi Darussalam to reconsider its reservation to the Convention on the Rights of the Child."
With regard to the reservation made by Saudi Arabia upon accession:
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made with regard to Brunei Darussalam.]
Signature
26.01.1990
Ratification / Accession
19.07.1991
Reservation / Declaration
19.07.1991, 16.11.1995, 02.07.1996, 03.07.1996, 10.02.1997